Why I'm Going To Vote For Donald Trump - jordan179
Why I'm Going To Vote For Donald Trump|
I am perfectly aware that Donald Trump is a very flawed human being, and worse is probably guilty of deliberate criminal fraud and possibly other felonies. However, the exact same thing is true of Hillary Clinton, with the addition of multiple murders. And ...
... Trump actually GETS that his number one job as President is going to be national security. He's said he's going to increase the power of our military and ... and this is the REALLY important part ...
... take back control of our borders, particularly in keeping out illegal aliens and Muslims.
The Democrats don't even seem to understand why this is important. They can't look past "We can get VOTES from the illegals if we naturalize them as citizens" and "the Muslims will VOTE for us" and see that what they are embarking on is one of the classic ways countries die -- namely, have a political faction invite in foreign barbarians to gain advantage in their conflicts with their rival politicians.
The Mexicans don't have values all that incompatible with our own. I'd be okay with making it easier for them to immigrate, coupled with heightened border security and screening out the criminal and terrorist element.
But that's NOT what the Democrats are doing. They're leaving the border wide open for ANYONE to come through, including foreign terrorists. If this goes on, eventually our enemies will walk A-Bombs in to the country by this route. This is security suicide.
The Muslims are far, far worse. They are impelled by a radical religious ideology that tells them that they have the right to rule the lands of the Infidel, and that any atrocity is justifiable in that cause -- that THEIR law should prevail over our Constitution
Those friends of mine who are female, or LGBTQ, should reflect that YOU are among the people who Muslims consider inferior (or in the case of LGBTQ, downright abominations) and worthy of abuse with no right to defend yourselves against this. You are seeing in Europe what happens when lots of Muslims are let into a country. Why do you believe it wouldn't happen here?
If we go with Hillary for 4 or 8 years, at the end of this America may well be embroiled in an ethnic civil war. We know what THAT looks like too -- I direct your gaze to the former Yugoslavia.
We Americans will probably win that war, but it won't be pretty, and when we come out of it we will have a really bone-deep hatred of those we fought (and probably extirpated in our own country). We will not be inclined to mercy. The consequences will be even worse abroad than they were here.
Hillary won't even listen to this argument. Her top adviser (and possible lover) is a Muslim. She will call anyone who points out the danger a "racist" (even though Islam is a RELIGION). She DID send a man to PRISON for criticizing Islam in a movie, and was PROUD of doing so.
So in conclusion, morally I don't see much difference between Hillary and Trump (Hillary seems more murderous, though), and Trump's proposed policies are considerably less disastrous for America than Hillary's. Given that the choice is binary, I choose Trump, as by far the lesser of the two evils.
It's totally two-faced of liberals to support Islam and LGBT. Islam throws LGBT off roofs yet liberals want thousands of more Muslims to come here. As proven by Orlando, the left couldn't care less about the LGBT as Obama the Selective Sleuth couldn't figure out the motive when it comes to Muslims, yet if a white person is involved, he automatically jumps to the conclusion that it was racism. The left only use the LGBT (as well as many other groups) as a voting bloc and nothing more. Thankfully, a few of them have rejected the Democratic Party.
In Germany, Merkel had a Christian activist arrested for supposedly agitating the people when she was only praying that their country wouldn't be overrun by Muslims (though it's too late for that). Her name's Heidl Mund.
As for Hillary, where do you think most of her donations come from? Muslim countries! She's also anti-women as she once laughed at a sexual assault victim (a 12 year old) while defending the pedophile!
I still don't trust Trump at all and it's going to take a hell of a lot of convincing to get me to vote for him.
Makes sense if what they really operate on is "Any stick will do to beat this dog."
|Date:||July 25th, 2016 12:43 am (UTC)|| |
Liberals hate Gays, hate Lesbians, hate Trans, they really hate them all. They have no problems at all with Muslims killing them. None, nada, zip.
They used the LGBT movement, like they use anything and anyone that they hate, and now that they're done with them, they will just toss them aside.
Like everything else, they figure they can control the muslims. After all, they've controlled all the other minorities, and they don't understand the belief in a religion or an ideology, as they don't believe in anything themselves.
When the rude awakening comes, we have to remember to NOT save them, not life a finger to help them, to let them all die. Or they'll just do it all over again. They're like a disease.
Exactly. Why else do they vilify any minority who rejects the Democrats?
Leftoids are simple minded critters. Muslims hate capitalism, Western culture, and values -- same as leftoids. Doesn't matter that they also hate LGBTs; doesn't matter that they throw acid in little girls' faces just because they want to go to school. Doesn't matter that they are fanatical religious believers when most of the left ridicules religion (so long as it's Christianity or Judaism) and/or believes in nothing other than their own idiot-ology, which might as well be their "religion". Same with Black Lives Matter -- some matter a helluvalot more than others, and their indignation is highly selective.
They either "think" they'll all be appointed as vizirs in the caliphate or "think" they'll get the upper hand after they destroy what's left of the West. Each side believes the other is their useful idiots, and it's the useful idiots who are the first to go when they are no longer useful.
"It's totally two-faced of liberals to support Islam and LGBT": it's like I always say: if it weren't for double standards liberals would have no standards.
"I still don't trust Trump at all and it's going to take a hell of a lot of convincing to get me to vote for him".
I don't trust him either, and he was far from my first choice for a lot of reasons. It's regrettable that Republicans were every bit as star-struck over TheDonald™ as the Dems were over the Big O back in Ought 8. Another rank amateur, but at least he once organized communities and won elections. TheDonald™ has never run for any public office AFAIK. I'm also not sure he can even win against a pro like Hillary, especially when he can't seem to leave this business with Ted Cruz alone.
It's a long way to Election Day. Unforch, I live in a swing state. It would be different if I came from a solid red or blue state. That way, I could vote my conscience instead of a nose holding vote for the lesser evil.
"Their indignation is highly selective". That right there sums up SJWs and BLM.
Given that I live in a blue state, does that mean I'm going to have to vote for the lesser of two evils? :/
Edited at 2016-07-25 07:57 pm (UTC)
Indeed, "pedophile" is too kind a word to describe Tom Taylor, who committed an extremely violent rape upon the victim, physically traumatizing her to the point that it probably contributed to her death by heart attack in 1992 (which might have been made more likely by the horror of seeing the woman who had facilitated her failure to get justice about to become the freaking First Lady). One should not imagine that this was merely a statuory rape charge applied to a love affair gone wrong It was both violent rape, and a gang rape.
And Hillary found it funny, probably because all the parties involved were people she would have considered "white trash."
Edited at 2016-08-04 12:59 pm (UTC)
The same people questioning Trump's mental health should also question Hillary's mental health. She thinks there's a vast right-wing conspiracy out to get her (paranoia) she laughs at rape victims (makes you wonder if she's a sociopath), from time to time she has that wide-eyed "crazy look" to her. Of course, she's a serial liar who thinks she can control the media. Her staff sees her as "angry, confused, and lost". Not only that, but she might have had a seizure once so she may have a medical problem too (apart from her shrill, raspy voice).
Hilary wants to be the next Merkel.
Yes, and with the example of Merkel right before us, our country would be foolish to put one in power over ourselves.
“Given that the choice is binary, I choose [NAME], as by far the lesser of the two evils.”
Many and many an election for anything, has been exactly thus. Me, I'm doing the same, and that is why.
Leader of the Free World. Boy, the bar is set so low in this country, some other head of state should get that title. I'm inclined to think the Israeli PM.
Living in super-solid red Oklahoma, I can vote Johnson/Weld, if I like, and know I'm not helping Clinton out at all. I don't envy anyone living in a battleground state.
At least you live in a red state. I live in Illinois so it leans more left. However, most Dems live in Chicago, East St. Louis, and Cairo. Hell, in the 2010 gubernatorial election, all but Cook, St. Clair and Alexander counties were red!
|Date:||July 25th, 2016 11:10 pm (UTC)|| |
I'm so glad I'm leaving. Illinois would be a red state without the gerrymandering. They are trying to fix it, but Madigan blocked attempts until after the election.
I wish I could leave too but my family will damn make sure I never do. :(
|Date:||July 27th, 2016 05:24 pm (UTC)|| |
Leader of the Free World?
"Leader of the Free World. Boy, the bar is set so low in this country ..."
Well, to be more accurate, the Obamanation is merely the "Reader of the Free World"; he can read what is put in from of him -- he even knows most of the words! -- and that's about the extent of it.
|Date:||July 27th, 2016 05:13 pm (UTC)|| |
illegal aliens and elections
"They can't look past "We can get VOTES from the illegals if we naturalize them as citizens" ..."
Actually, as the Democrats understand -- and as most people do not -- that they can get electoral benefit from illegal aliens even if *none* of them ever commit vote fraud and even if *none* of them are ever naturalized.
This is because the Constitution -- in one of the *few* of its provisions they don't openly (*) seek to destroy -- apportions representation, and thus political power, by enumeration (*) of population rather than by enumeration of citizens.
(*) This is why the Democrats are forever trying to change the reported result of the Census to be based on imputed population rather than enumerated population.
|Date:||July 29th, 2016 12:29 am (UTC)|| |
Not the libertarians?
Since you live in California, which is going to go for Clinton anyway, I'm surprised you aren't voting for Johnson.
For the record I am also leaning to Trump. I like that he is going to put a stop or at least a damper on Muslim immigration till we can "vet" it, which means -- probably not for a LONG TIME. This is very important. It is important enough to ignore or try to ignore Trump's obvious problems as a leader. There are many but putting a freeze on letting more Muslims in particularly from places like Syria -- is enough to make me overlook them.
Also, he is not holding hands with BLM as Hillary is doing. I do think she was pushed to the left by Bernie but still... cop killing and riots and increased murder rates in cities (mainly in black neighborhoods) is the fruit of BLM. I do think we need to look at police corruption and abuses, but the reach of BLM is beyond that and they are doing real damage to the society now.
However, I have grave misgivings about Trump: his lack of experience, his inability to let go of a slight -- real or imagined, and his general narcissism. I wanted Ted Cruz, but that's not who we got so...
In any event, I live in California and so my vote is not going to be as crucial as if I lived in Colorado or Nevada. I may change my mind if Trump says too many crazy things but I doubt it.
I am not sure about his stance on NATO or trade. Those are big things, but again, this is where I am leaning now.
Edited at 2016-08-04 08:28 am (UTC)
I wonder if Trump is going to stay in the race until the end. There's no way Billiary will let Trump win anyway, after all, laws are made to be broken, according to them. The Clinton machine is disgustingly vile.
I'M SO GLAD I WAS WRONG!!!!! YAY!!!!!
Former Yugoslavia was a case of Muslims being murdered by genocidal militias led by the Serbs.
You are being Islamophobic and citing a case of anti-Muslim genocide? What next? Using the Holocaust to excuse anti-semitism?