On the Milwaukee Riots - jordan179
On the Milwaukee Riots|
|Date:||August 18th, 2016 05:46 pm (UTC)|| |
I'm sorry, well, not really, but your comment is actual racism and shows distinct bias.
Cop shot black man, oooohhhhh, RACISMMMMMM!!!!!!!!
In other words, you automatically thought the police officer was white. As if all police officers are white and there are no blacks, asians, latinos, mixed race cops.
And your bias shows in the fact that you automatically assumed that the cop shot the perpetrator because he is a cop, not because he had just cause.
It is quite clear that BLM has clouded your perceptions. You automatically think that when a cop kills a black person, it's always the cop who is in the wrong. I'm not saying that in the recent past, the police has not been too free with their guns. I, too, have criticized their behaviour, but ONLY AFTER GETTING ALL THE FACTS!!! Like when they shot a ten or eleven year old kid, waving a toy gun around, before the cruiser had even come to a stop. In many other cases, I've been critical, but only after I had all the facts.
What happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? I suggest you read my first post, where you'll see who is actually the largest enemy of the blacks in the US. It's not the police. It's their own people. Yet, BLM stays silent about the death toll exacted by black-on-black violence. They don't care that, in Chicago, for instance, so far this year, there have been over 2500 shootings, most of which is black-on-black. Why? Because it doesn't do well in public perception. Because it shows why the police are so trigger happy, when it comes to black criminals. Because cops know that in certain areas, you either shoot first, or your family gets a call because you either ended up in a hospital or the morgue.
To be fair unlike the vast majority of kitten's political affiliation kitten actually stopped and considered the facts.
|Date:||August 19th, 2016 05:47 pm (UTC)|| |
Too little, too late. She considered the facts AFTER having automatically jumped to conclusions. That shows an immense amount of bias. A normal person would wait on the facts of the case, before making any assumptions. However, we all know that a certain group of people (and I'm not speaking of people of a certain skin colour, but of ideology), immediately jump onto their preconceived notions.
Black person killed by cop = racist cop = poor, sweet, church-going boy who never hurt no one.
We'll all hear his grandma tell people how he was jus' wantin' to hand over the gun he found on the ground and the cops shot him for no good reason. HIs sister already told the rioters to take their rioting out of her neighbourhood, to the suburbs because she's concerned about them burning the weaves, even though she doesn't herself use weaves. And that is not a joke, that is a fact. CNN was called out on Reddit and other social media for doctoring the video of her speech, claiming initially that she was calling for peace, but leaving out the rest of it, where she told the rioters to take it to the suburbs. Strange priorities.
Until people like kitten stop immediately jumping to conclusions and actually wait on the facts of the case, anything they say is worthless. Facts are meaningless to them. They are the perfect example of the idiocracy, perfect followers of the like of TheRevAl and Jesse Jackass. The perfect example of Obama's foot in mouth before having the facts disease. Like the Henry Louis Gates affair.
I'm not impressed with kitten's sudden 180 degree turn, AFTER THE FACT. The narrative is already out there. the BLM movement, the SJWs and their blind followers are clinging to it and no matter what facts come out, that will be their rallying cry. When the officer is acquitted from any wrongdoing, they will say that it is because he's a cop. It doesn't matters what the facts say. It doesn't matter if there is camera footage.
She sounds like a Hillary supporter, doing a 180 when caught red-handed. Hillary pretends to forget everything related to all her wrongdoings.